Improved health practices and sanitation are
an obvious starting point for improving health in rural Cambodia, writes John
Macgregor. A shift in thinking away from rigidly rational development models to
a more random, spirited approach may also help, he argues.
The
most visually striking thing about rural Cambodia might be the abysmal state of
people’s health. If you were someone who liked log-frame diagrams, you might
have arrows emanating from poverty, dirty water, outdoor defecation and poor
nutrition to pictures of listless adults, kids infested with parasites, and
just about everyone some inches shorter than their optimal height. In villages
far from a main road, that’s certainly the visual which hits you in the face.
In some
places, nearly everyone is sick. Work is slow, and learning largely absent.
Ratanakkiri province, for example, has worse child stunting, and child
mortality, than Sierra Leone.
Battambang
province has more of a mixture of pluses and minuses. Knach Romeas commune on
the Thai border, for example, has high rice production – but no clean water. A
recent study there by the NGO I work with, Lom Orng, found that residents spend
18 per cent of their disposable income on expensive, untreated, trucked-in
water. This water (and sanitation in general) is so bad that villagers spend
another 27 per cent on medical bills. At a guess, bad water might steal away a
third of local income.
But
every aid practitioner knows that single issues are a bit of an illusion. How
do you tease water apart from sanitation, or sanitation from education, or
education from income? And what if you overlay factors like high birth rate and
global warming? Or the downstream effects of the latter, such as the flooding
of the Mekong Delta and the millions this will displace on Cambodia’s doorstep?
At this point your log-framer might start to go mad (assuming log-framers
aren’t this way already).
Given
the infinity of problems, and the finitude of money, the best anyone can do is
to arm themselves to the teeth with a love of the poor (incidentally, a
solution par excellence to Western neuroses), and to pick the high-yield
targets.
The
US$1.4m After the Flood project – being run across three northwestern provinces
by four local NGOs – is providing seeds and training for a quick short-term
rice crop, re-stocking chicken coops and vegetable gardens, and building
food-dense Permaculture “safe grounds” above the flood line. It is also
repairing schools, education being the specialty of one consortium member, PKO.
The
psychological software is being addressed as well: here we judged that poor
hygiene and sanitation habits are the most compelling target, given that they
poison both water sources and food. In lieu of crowding people into rooms with
whiteboards, the hygiene trainers have opted for a little drama. Perhaps 40
villagers are brought together to draw a map of the village in the dirt.
Various coloured sands are provided to represent walkways, homes, streams, and
so on. They are then asked to mark areas where they shit. (I’ll use that word
rather than “defecate”, as our Khmer teams are rather taken with its
naughtiness, which chimes well with colloquial Khmer. They now laughingly refer
to themselves as “shit experts”.)
Drawing
a village map can take all morning. Trainers might step in sometimes and ask,
for example, what people make of the fact that they are shitting within a few
feet of their water source. But mostly they allow villagers to draw their own
map and reach their own conclusions.
Then
walks are done to outside toilet areas, and shit collected. Flies are observed
gathering on it, and then on people. It’s mixed with drinking water in a plastic
bottle, and offered round as a drink, to general guffaws. Basic facts about the
fecal-oral route of water and food contamination are introduced – but 95 per
cent of it is letting villagers describe their own patterns of behaviour, see
them in a slightly new light, and make their own connections.
We
haven’t gauged results yet, but this Community-Led Total Sanitation training is
certainly confronting enough to grab villagers’ attention. And as they are
driving the process; they feel free to have noisy debates. Getting a birds’ eye
view of things seems to be another clincher: seeing the relationships in
graphical form.
After
the Flood has no consultants, no SUVs, and one meeting a month, which no one
enjoys. It is succeeding partly because it is lean, but mostly because my
Cambodian colleagues are so good at what they do. While they possess the Khmer
impatience with theory and detail – and so tend to jump straight in – this is
because they know their communes like the backs of their hands. These are the
men and women who jumped into boats with supplies last October, and saved 6,000
inundated people from malnutrition, disease and death – on two days’ notice.
The
project to date has been characterised by cross-fertilisation. The CLTS
training was taught to the other NGOs by Ockenden, which has experience in it.
Lom Orng has shared its knowledge of short-term rice cropping and horticulture;
while DCO – more of a nuts-and-bolts operation – racked up large tallies of
ponds, safe grounds, chicken coops and vegetable gardens in the first month,
spurring everyone else to get moving. Several times staff from the various NGOs
have pooled their salaries to build houses for flood survivors they found
living on the dirt.
The
project is having some effects beyond its bounds. Its Permaculture
demonstration farm, begun by Ockenden in Battambang’s Rukha Kiri district, will
long outlive the project, and will hopefully become a permanent feature of the
country’s agricultural landscape. For Lom Orng, After the Flood has
strengthened our grasp of the link between water and health, and we have
drafted a plan to bring cheap, reticulated water to scores of communes – using
the profit from one commune to seed a venture in a neighbour: a kind of
commune-leapfrogging revolving fund.
Seeing
a village boy with tuberculosis last week – the disease that killed my
grandmother back in 1931, a decade before antibiotics – reminded me of the
distance left to travel. Much of that distance will be covered in a motley
rather than a rational way. But leaving certain things to the gods of randomness
is the heart of Asian psychology, and if we mean what we say about allowing
local communities to design and lead their own development, allowing for some
happy accidents would be in the spirit of things.
John
Macgregor is communications director at the Lom Orng Organisation (formerly the
Cambodian War Amputees Rehabilitation Society). Lom Orng is part of a
consortium of NGOs running After the Flood in Bantheay Meanchey, Battambang and
Pursat. The others are Ockenden Cambodia, Disadvantaged Cambodians Organisation
and Puthi Komar Organisation.
The
Phnom Penh Post
No comments:
Post a Comment