Scientists have discovered proof that the
evolution of intelligence and larger brain sizes can be driven by cooperation
and teamwork, shedding new light on the origins of what it means to be human.
The
study appears online in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B and was
led by scientists at Trinity College Dublin: PhD student, Luke McNally and
Assistant Professor Dr Andrew Jackson at the School of Natural Sciences in
collaboration with Dr Sam Brown of the University of Edinburgh.
The
researchers constructed computer models of artificial organisms, endowed with
artificial brains, which played each other in classic games, such as the
'Prisoner's Dilemma', that encapsulate human social interaction. They used 50
simple brains, each with up to 10 internal processing and 10 associated memory
nodes. The brains were pitted against each other in these classic games.
The
game was treated as a competition, and just as real life favours successful
individuals, so the best of these digital organisms which was defined as how
high they scored in the games, less a penalty for the size of their brains were
allowed to reproduce and populate the next generation of organisms.
By
allowing the brains of these digital organisms to evolve freely in their model
the researchers were able to show that the transition to cooperative society
leads to the strongest selection for bigger brains. Bigger brains essentially
did better as cooperation increased.
The
social strategies that emerge spontaneously in these bigger, more intelligent
brains show complex memory and decision making. Behaviours like forgiveness,
patience, deceit and Machiavellian trickery all evolve within the game as
individuals try to adapt to their social environment.
"The
strongest selection for larger, more intelligent brains, occurred when the
social groups were first beginning to start cooperating, which then kicked off
an evolutionary Machiavellian arms race of one individual trying to outsmart
the other by investing in a larger brain. Our digital organisms typically start
to evolve more complex 'brains' when their societies first begin to develop
cooperation." explained Dr Andrew Jackson.
The
idea that social interactions underlie the evolution of intelligence has been
around since the mid-70s, but support for this hypothesis has come largely from
correlative studies where large brains were observed in more social animals.
The
authors of the current research provide the first evidence that mechanistically
links decision making in social interactions with the evolution of
intelligence. This study highlights the utility of evolutionary models of
artificial intelligence in answering fundamental biological questions about our
own origins.
"Our
model differs in that we exploit the use of theoretical experimental evolution
combined with artificial neural networks to actually prove that yes, there is
an actual cause-and-effect link between needing a large brain to compete
against and cooperate with your social group mates."
"Our
extraordinary level of intelligence defines mankind and sets us apart from the
rest of the animal kingdom. It has given us the arts, science and language, and
above all else the ability to question our very existence and ponder the
origins of what makes us unique both as individuals and as a species,"
concluded PhD student and lead author Luke McNally.
No comments:
Post a Comment