Money doesn't buy happiness. Neither does
materialism: Research shows that people who place a high value on wealth,
status, and stuff are more depressed and anxious and less sociable than those
who do not.
Now new
research shows that materialism is not just a personal problem. It's also
environmental. "We found that irrespective of personality, in situations
that activate a consumer mindset, people show the same sorts of problematic
patterns in wellbeing, including negative affect and social disengagement,"
says Northwestern University psychologist Galen V. Bodenhausen.
The
study, conducted with colleagues Monika A. Bauer, James E. B. Wilkie, and Jung
K. Kim, appears in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for
Psychological Science.
In two
of four experiments, university students were put in a materialistic frame of
mind by tasks that exposed them to images of luxury goods or words mobilizing
consumerist values (versus neutral scenes devoid of consumer products or words
without such connotations). Completing questionnaires afterwards, those who
looked at the pictures of cars, electronics, and jewelry rated themselves
higher in depression and anxiety, less interested in social activities like
parties, and more in solitary pursuits than the others. Those primed to
materialism by exposure to certain words evinced more competitiveness and less
desire to invest their time in pro-social activities like working for a good
cause.
In two
other experiments, participants completed tasks that were framed as surveys --
one of consumer responses, another of citizens.' The first experiment involved
moving words toward or away from the participant's name on a computer screen --
positive and negative emotion words and "neutral" ones that actually
suggested materialism (wealth, power), self-restraint (humble, discipline),
transcendence of self, or self-indulgence. The people who answered the
"consumer response survey" more quickly "approached" the
words that reflected materialistic values than those in the "citizen"
survey.
The
last experiment presented participants with a hypothetical water shortage in a
well shared by four people, including themselves. The water users were
identified either as consumers or individuals. Might the collective identity as
consumers -- as opposed to the individual role -- supersede the selfishness
ordinarily stimulated by the consumer identity? No: The "consumers"
rated themselves as less trusting of others to conserve water, less personally
responsible and less in partnership with the others in dealing with the crisis.
The consumer status, the authors concluded "did not unite; it
divided."
The
findings have both social and personal implications, says Bodenhausen.
"It's become commonplace to use consumer as a generic term for
people," in the news or discussions of taxes, politics, or health care. If
we use term such as Americans or citizens instead, he says, "that subtle
difference activates different psychological concerns." We can also take
personal initiative to reduce the depressive, isolating effects of a
materialist mindset by avoiding its stimulants -- most obviously, advertising.
One method: "Watch less TV."
Source:
Association for Psychological Science
No comments:
Post a Comment