People who eat plenty of fish may have a
lower risk of colon cancer and, even more, rectal cancer, according to an
analysis of 41 studies from around the world.
The
analysis, which appeared in the American Journal of Medicine, is the latest
report that ties fish consumption to a number of possible health benefits.
Jie
Liang of Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases in Xi'an, China, and colleagues
combined the results from 41 studies published between 1990 and 2011 that
measured fish consumption and tracked cancer diagnoses. This included research
from the United States, Norway, Japan, Finland and elsewhere.
"Our
findings from this meta-analysis suggest that fish consumption is inversely
associated with colorectal cancer,"Liang and his colleagues wrote.
Overall,
regularly eating fish was tied to a 12 per cent lower risk of developing or
dying of colon or rectal cancer, the researchers found.
That
was after taking into account study participants' age, alcohol and red meat
intake, family history of cancer and other risk factors.
"People
who rarely eat fish may experience health benefits in a variety of areas -
heart disease, reproductive and now colon cancer - by increasing their fish
consumption somewhat,"said Michael Gochfeld, a professor of environmental
and occupational medicine at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
The
protective effect tied to fish consumption was stronger for rectal cancer than
colon cancer.
People
who ate the highest amounts of fish had a 21 per cent lower risk of getting
rectal cancer than those who ate the least. That compared to just a four per
cent lower risk of colon cancer - so small that it could have been due to
chance.
The new
study focused specifically on fresh fish, and the authors noted that they were
unable to pinpoint what types of fish people ate or the manner in which fish
was prepared in the prior studies.
"Cooking
temperatures might affect the risk of colorectal cancer," Liang said in an
email to Reuters Health, citing recent evidence that suggests eating lots of
meat and fish barbecued or grilled over high heat may actually be tied to an
increased cancer risk.
His
team also did not investigate why eating fish may have a positive effect on
colorectal cancer risk. The study also can't prove that it's the fish, itself,
that was responsible for a lower cancer risk in some participants.
"It
doesn't tell us whether the benefit you get from fish has to do with specific
nutrients in the fish, or with the fact that people who tend to eat fish often
adopt other healthful lifestyles, such as avoiding red meat or processed
meats," said Gochfeld, who was not involved in the study.
If fish
indeed is behind the lower colorectal cancer risk, the added benefit could be
coming from the omega-3 essential fatty acids found in certain fish such as
salmon and sardines, he added. But it remains unclear if fish-oil capsules and
other supplements would have the same benefit.
A study
that appeared in February showed that women who eat about three servings of
fish per week have a somewhat lower chance of having colon polyps, which can
develop into cancer, than women who eat less than a serving a week.
Reuters
No comments:
Post a Comment