Older women who eat a lot of starchy and sweet carbohydrates may be at
increased risk of a less common but deadlier form of breast cancer, a new study
suggests.
The findings, from a study of
nearly 335,000 European women, do not prove that your French fries, sweets and
white bread contribute to breast cancer.
But they do hint at a potential
factor in a little understood form of breast cancer, according to a researcher
not involved in the work.
Specifically, the study found a
connection between high "glycemic load" and breast cancers that lack
receptors for the female sex hormone estrogen.
A high glycemic load essentially
means a diet heavy in foods that cause a rapid spike in blood sugar. The usual
culprits include processed foods made from white flour, potatoes and sweets. A
sweet, juicy piece of fruit can also raise blood sugar quickly. But since
fruits are low in calories, they don't contribute as much to your diet's
glycemic load.
So-called estrogen receptor
(ER)-negative tumours account for about one-quarter of breast cancers. They
typically have a poorer prognosis than ER-positive cancers because they tend to
grow faster and are not sensitive to hormone-based therapies.
In this study, postmenopausal
women whose diets were very high in glycemic load had a 36-per cent higher risk
of ER-negative breast cancer, compared with women whose diets had the lightest
load.
In general, a diet with a high
glycemic load is not a particularly healthy one, noted Christina Clarke, a
research scientist at the Cancer Prevention Institute of California in Fremont,
and a consulting assistant professor at Stanford University.
"These types of diets have
been associated with many negative health outcomes," said Clarke, who was
not involved in the study.
So although the current findings
do not prove cause-and-effect, they can give women another reason to make
healthier diet choices, according to Clarke.
Lead researcher Isabelle Romieu,
of the International Agency for Research on Cancer in Lyon, France, did not
respond to an email request for an interview.
From a scientific standpoint,
Clarke said the results are interesting because so little is known about what
causes ER-negative breast cancers. Most breast tumours - the ER-positive ones -
have their growth fueled by estrogen.
"We really don't know
anything about what causes (ER-negative) tumours," Clarke said. "This
study gives us a really important clue for future research."
Diets with a high glycemic load
are associated with a bigger secretion of insulin, a hormone that regulates
blood sugar. High insulin levels, in turn, have been linked to certain cancers,
possibly because insulin helps tumours grow.
The current findings hint at a
role for "insulin pathways" in ER-negative breast cancer, according
to Clarke. "But there's definitely more work that needs to be done,"
she said.
The findings, which appear in the
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, are based on a long-running European
study on nutrition factors and cancer risk.
Of nearly 335,000 women in the
study, 11,576 developed breast cancer over a dozen years. Overall, there was no
link between breast cancer risk and glycemic load - estimated from diet
questionnaires the women completed at the study's start.
But the picture changed when the
researchers focused on postmenopausal women with ER-negative cancer. Among
women in the top 20 per cent for glycemic load, there were 158 cases of breast
cancer, versus 111 cases in the bottom 20 per cent.
When breast tumours also lacked
receptors for the hormone progesterone, the gap was a bit more pronounced.
Still, the numbers "weren't
huge," Clarke noted. And there are many other factors that could be
different between those groups of women, although the study did account for
some of them, including weight, exercise habits, calorie intake and smoking.
Clarke pointed out that there is
no single factor in any woman's risk of breast cancer. But, she said, the
findings offer more incentive to eat a balanced diet that limits refined carbs
in favour of healthier fare - like lean protein, vegetables, "good"
fats and high-fiber grains.
"Really, you want to avoid
these (high glycemic load) diets anyway," Clarke said.
Reuters
No comments:
Post a Comment