NEW YORK - When Cynthia Craig was diagnosed with postpartum depression eight years
ago, she told her family doctor she felt anxious about motherhood.
She wondered whether she had made
a catastrophic mistake by quitting her job, whether she could cope with the
long, lonely hours stay-at-home mothers face - and even whether she should have
had children.
"Anxiety is something I have
always had, especially during times of change," said Craig, 40, who lives
in Scotland, Ontario. "But I was never worried about the level of anxiety,
and it never prevented me from leaving the house, driving, socialising or even
speaking in front of people."
Her doctor referred her to an
anxiety clinic, where a nurse asked Craig dozens of yes-or-no questions - are
you afraid of snakes? do you hear voices? do you vomit from anxiety? - and made
a diagnosis.
"She said, 'Let's call it
Generalised Anxiety Disorder with a touch of social phobia,'" Craig said.
That didn't feel right to her,
but the clinic's psychiatrist agreed with the nurse and said Craig's concerns
about motherhood constituted an anxiety disorder, a form of mental illness, and
prescribed Pfizer's Effexor and then GlaxoSmithKline's Paxil.
Craig says the drugs exacerbated
the very anxiety that she doubted required medication.
Craig's case is one of millions
that constitute an extraordinary trend in mental illness: an increase in the
prevalence of reported anxiety disorders of more than 1,200 per cent since
1980.
In that year, 2 per cent to 4 per
cent of Americans suffered from an anxiety disorder, according to the American
Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental
Disorders, used by psychiatrists and others worldwide to diagnose mental
illness.
In 1994, a study asking a random
sample of thousands of Americans about their mental health reported that 15 per
cent had ever suffered from anxiety disorders.
A 2009 study of people
interviewed about their anxiety repeatedly for years raised that estimate to
49.5 per cent - which would be 117 million US adults.
Some psychiatrists say the
increase in the prevalence of anxiety from about 4 per cent to 50 per cent is
the result of psychiatrists and others "getting better at diagnosing
anxiety,"as Dr. Carolyn Robinowitz, a past president of the APA who is in
private practice in Washington, D.C., put it.
"People who criticise that
are showing their bias," she said. "When we get better at diagnosing
hypertension, we don't say that's terrible."
Critics, including other leading
psychiatrists, disagree. They say the apparent explosion in anxiety shows there
is something seriously and dangerously wrong with the DSM. Its next edition,
due in May, would lower the threshold for identifying anxiety.
The criticism rests on three
arguments. First, the DSM fails to recognize that anxiety is normal and even
beneficial in many situations, so it conflates a properly functioning brain
system with a pathology.
Second, the DSM's description of
anxiety is more about enforcing social norms than medicine.
Finally, they say, anxiety is
adaptive. Its brain circuitry was honed by evolution for a purpose. Only when
that mechanism misfires should a person be diagnosed as mentally ill.
"No human emotion is more
basic than anxiety," said sociologist Allan Horwitz of Rutgers University.
"Many forms of it simply
should not be categorized as disorders, because they're the result of the way
people evolved thousands of years ago, rather than something going wrong."
Identifying the truly ill
Horwitz and other critics
recognise that when the brain's anxiety system misfires it can prevent people
from functioning, as when someone is unable to leave home, interact with
friends and family or walk past even a leashed dog.
But the anxiety system is working
properly when it makes someone afraid of heights or wild dogs or threatening
strangers.
"Anxiety or panic symptoms
that have been severe, persistent and cause clinically significant distress or
impairment need to be diagnosed promptly," said Dr. Allen Frances, a
psychiatrist who led the previous DSM revision and questions some of the new
criteria. "Very effective treatments are available."
"We don't oppose people
getting treatment," said Horwitz, co-author of the new book "All We
Have to Fear: Psychiatry's Transformation of Natural Anxieties into Mental
Disorders." "But people are much too willing to think they have a
disorder that requires treatment."
Many psychiatrists don't see it
that way. Under changes for the DSM-5 proposed by experts convened by the APA,
symptoms such as excessive worry, restlessness, feeling on edge, avoiding
activities that cause anxiety, and being overly concerned about health or
finances or family would have to be present for only three months rather than
six to justify a diagnosis of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD).
And people would have to display
one physical symptom, not the current three.
"Because its threshold for
GAD is set so ridiculously low, DSM-5 will mislabel as mentally ill many people
who are experiencing no more than the normal and expected worries of everyday
life," said Frances.
Dr. Donna Rockwell, a clinical
psychologist who has organized opposition to aspects of the DSM-5 process,
warned that "unless (the APA's experts) come to their senses, GAD will be
identical to the existential worries all of us face as part of being
human."
That will bring "a bonanza
to the drug companies," she added, opening the floodgates to "more
inappropriate, expensive and potentially harmful drug use."
Drugmakers reported US$661
million ($839 million) in US sales of anti-anxiety drugs last year, according
to IMS Health.
Most psychiatrists see that as
evidence people suffering from mental illness are getting help.
On Thursday the Pharmaceutical
Research and Manufacturers of America issued a report touting the many drugs
being developed for mental illnesses, including 26 for anxiety.
"When anxiety symptoms
impair a person's functioning, what's so bad about helping them get back to a
normal state and using medication if appropriate?" asked Robinowitz.
The message that what used to be
considered part of the human condition is pathological is getting through, at
least to some people.
James Heaney, 44, told his family
physician in 2000 that he often felt shy or mildly depressed in social
situations - "like I saw on the TV commercial" telling viewers to
"ask your doctor"about social anxiety. "There was no in-depth
evaluation of my symptoms," said Heaney, then a network administrator for
a school district near Rochester, New York.
After a 10-minute interview, he
had a diagnosis of "mild social anxiety" and a prescription for
Paxil. "For such a powerful drug," he said, "it was remarkably
easy to get."
Evolutionary response
Research over the past decade
shows that feeling anxious is how the brain's emotion centers send signals to
its thinking centers that something is amiss.
For instance, it is normal to be
anxious over a sick child, a loved one's illness, unemployment or other
setbacks in life, said N e w York University sociologist Jerome Wakefield,
co-author of "All We Have to Fear."
"The feeling of anxiety
tells you something poses a threat, which can motivate you to stay
vigilant" - about, say, a change in a sick child's symptoms, he said.
In the Paleolithic era, when our
prehistoric ancestors lived in small clans, how people were viewed by strangers
and kin could determine survival.
So when people fret over going to
a party, giving a speech or otherwise subject themselves to judgment, it
reflects an adaptive response to the millennia-old need to be attuned to other
people's disapproval, researchers say.
Anxiety about public speaking
accounts for about half the diagnoses of social anxiety disorder.
"There is great evolutionary
and survival value in anxiety, which makes it difficult to identify as an
illness or pathology," said psychologist Frank Farley of Temple
University.
Anxiety was working properly among
survivors of Hurricane Katrina, Wakefield and Horwitz contend. Years after the
devastating 2005 storm, schools, housing, policing and other aspects of life in
New Orleans had still not returned to normal.
Using DSM criteria, a 2007 study
concluded that half the surviving residents were "mentally ill"
because they experienced anxiety about those lingering effects.
"If you survived Katrina,
anxiety is not a sign of mental illness; it's the brain working as it
should," said Wakefield. Such emotions can spur survivors to agitate for
rebuilding neighborhoods, he said.
Another concern is that by
labeling normal human variation - being more anxious, fearful or worried than
the average person - a mental illness, psychiatry is venturing into social
control.
"To suggest that anyone
who's afraid to speak in front of hundreds of strangers has a mental illness
creates social pressure to change," said Wakefield. "And that pushes
psychiatry away from medicine and into enforcing social values."
Bad reactions
In retrospect, Marla Royce (who
asked that her real name not be used) thinks her brain's anxiety system was
working as evolution intended.
A successful Texas novelist, she
was upset about the death of her father in 2004. Her anxiety was compounded
when her publisher did not promote her new book, leading Royce to worry that
her writing career was over.
"It was just garden-variety
situational anxiety," she says now about the agitation and disorientation
she felt.
Royce said she went along
"trustingly and blithely" when a family physician diagnosed her with
GAD.
"He said the pharma sales
rep had just left some samples, so he gave me Lexapro," to which a
psychiatrist added Paxil, Xanax and Klonopin.
She became dependent on the
drugs, taking ever-higher doses. Her psychiatrist told her that "was proof
my anxiety disorder was out of control and that I would have to be medicated
for life."
She suffered "steadily
declining mental and physical health" until she stopped the meds five
years ago and shared her story with the online support group PaxilProgress.
James Heaney's shyness turned to
numbness on Paxil. "It made me insular and nonresponsive to my friends and
family," he said.
"My mood became very
variable," and co-workers told him they felt uncomfortable asking him for
computer help as they once did"because they weren't sure which James they
would get."
He weaned himself off psychiatric
drugs in 2011. The social anxiety he still occasionally feels "is a
relatively easy problem to deal with," he said.
For Cynthia Craig, the drugs she
was prescribed triggered "excruciating anxiety symptoms like I had never
experienced in my entire life."
"I told my doctor I don't
want to be on anything," she said."My anxiety is predictable and
something I can handle."
Reuters
No comments:
Post a Comment