Examples of failure in four different lengths of nanowire as a result of
tensile stress. Only nanowire sections close to the fracture are shown. A short
(188 nanometer (nm)) nanowire fails through gradual, ductile deformation (top).
A long (1,503 nm) nanowire fails abruptly through a brittle or localized shear
failure (bottom).
Mechanical failure of short nanowires is characterized by smooth,
ductile deformations, while long nanowires fail catastrophically
Most materials will break when a
force is applied to an imperfection in their structure — such as a notch or
dislocation. The behavior of these imperfections, and the resulting breakage,
differ markedly between small structures, such as nanowires, and larger, bulk
materials. However, scientists lacked complete understanding of the precise
mechanics of nanowire breakages, owing in part to inconsistent behavior in
experiments. These inconsistencies are now resolved thanks to numerical
simulations by Zhaoxuan Wu and his co-workers at the A*STAR Institute for High
Performance Computing, Singapore, and collaborators in the USA1.
The researchers focused on metal
nanowires with a so-called 'face-centered cubic crystal structure' because they
exhibit two different failure modes. Previous experiments by other groups
showed that these nanowires can break as the result of a ductile process, in
which a narrow neck is formed smoothly and continuously before failure. Other
experiments showed that the failure was caused by a brittle fracture, which
happened suddenly. To complicate matters further, atom-scale simulations of
these experiments predicted that only ductile necking should be occurring.
Wu and co-workers approached the
problem by searching for a set of nanowire parameters that they could use to
predict the type of failure. They used molecular dynamics software to simulate
a series of cylindrical copper nanowires with a diameter of 20 nanometers and
lengths ranging between 188 nanometers and 1,503 nanometers. They ‘cut’ a notch
of 0.5 nanometers into the nanowire surface, which served as an initial
deformation, and then applied tensile stress along the nanowire’s long axis.
These simulations predicted that
long nanowires were brittle and would fail abruptly, while short nanowires less
than 1,500 nanometers in length were ductile and would exhibit a smooth
deformation before failure. In other words, says Wu, they “fail gracefully”.
Previous nanowire simulations failed to identify these two regimes because the
nanowire lengths considered were too short. The difference in behavior results
from the fact that, for a given strain, long nanowires store a greater quantity
of elastic energy than shorter wires.
This insight allowed Wu and
co-workers to derive a simple expression for the length at which nanowires
switch between failure modes. Both this expression, and the full simulation
results, matched experimental data well. The results, says Wu, resolve an
outstanding scientific issue, and provide a basic engineering principle for the
design of nanoscale mechanical systems. Whether the model applies to nanowires
with very small diameters, where classical plasticity effects begin to be lost,
remains to be tested.
The A*STAR-affiliated researchers
contributing to this research are from the Institute for High Performance Computing
References
- Wu, Z., Zhang, Y.-W., Jhon, M. H., Gao, H. &
Srolovitz, D. J. Nanowire failure: long = brittle and short =
ductile. Nano Letters 12, 910–914
(2012). | article
No comments:
Post a Comment