Fatness, heart disease & overburdened
public hospitals from too much sugar in national diet to be fought with taxes.
TAXES
& PUBLIC HEALTH
Sugar tax
for public health: Soft drinks 20-25% price rise
Soft
drinks could be 20-25% more expensive very soon.
That is,
if the cabinet approves a new sugar tax proposed by reform councillors.
PUBLIC
HEALTH PROBLEMS FROM TOO MUCH SUGAR
The new
taxes are aimed at discouraging Thais from consuming too much sugar and
improving public health.
At
present, Thais rank ninth worldwide in sugar consumption.
Drinking
large amounts of sugar increases risks of obesity, hypertension and heart
disease and other illnesses.
This adds
to the state's heathcare burden under Thailand's universal coverage healthcare
system.
These
facts have been laid out in a report from the National Reform Steering
Assembly's (NRSA) health and environmental reform committee.
UNHEALTHY
SUGAR LEVELS TO BE TAXED
An excise
tax on beverages with unhealthy sugar levels — more than six grammes per 100
millilitres -- was proposed by the reform committee.
Taxed
drinks will include carbonated drinks, green tea, coffee, energy drinks, sour
milk, soy milk and juices.
MORE
SUGAR MEANS HIGHER TAX
Two rates
of the excise tax were proposed based on different sugar levels.
Drinks
with 6g to 10g per 100ml of sugar would be subject to a rate that would raise
their retail prices by at least 20%.
Those
with more than 10g of sugar would see their prices at least 25% higher.
The
reform report stated that most local beverages contained more than 6g of sugar
per 100ml.
The
proposed tax was estimated to increase national income by more than 10 billion
baht a year in the future.
The NRSA
would also ask the Interior Ministry to regulate lucky draw marketing campaigns
by sugary beverage manufacturers to further reduce sugar intake nationally.
REFORM
STEERING COMMITTEE VOTES FOR TAX
The
National Reform Steering Assembly (NRSA) voted Tuesday to table the so-called
sugar tax for cabinet consideration, for better public health public health.and
larger state revenue.
The
resolution was backed with 153 votes against two with six abstentions and will
be proposed to the cabinet later.
Aekarach
Sattaburuth
No comments:
Post a Comment