Consumers say that they are concerned about
privacy, but their actions say otherwise.
Who
would have guessed that the Illinois DMV — really, any DMV — would be more
progressive than Facebook? I renewed my driver's license last week and, with
the stroke of an arcane pen to an arcane piece of paper, gave notice that I'm
an organ donor.
As you
may have heard, Mark
Zuckerberg on Tuesday revealed a new Facebook status update: organ
donor. Facebook trailing the DMV? Really? What's next, Facebook making people
take a virtual number and stand in a seemingly endless line until you can
"like" something?
Now, I
am not making light of the monumental impact that Facebook's announcement could
have — really, is having. According to various news
reports, by the end of Tuesday, "6,000 people had enrolled through 22
state registries, according to Donate Life America, which promotes donations
and is working with Facebook. On a normal day, those states together see less
than 400 sign up."
Organ donation is a
serious issue and deserves greater attention from all of us. The publicity
generated by Zuckerberg's announcement can only help those 114,236 people
waiting for an organ and may, just may, save one of the 18 people who will die
today because they were on that list.
The
fact that so many people responded so quickly to the Facebook announcement
shouldn't really surprise anyone. For an ever-growing segment of the
population, Facebook and other social media are their primary means of
communicating, and health status is one of the main updates. Roughly one-third
of adult consumers now use social media to discuss health-related issues,
according to a recent PwC
Health Research Institute survey.
Among
the key findings: 42 percent said they've used social media to access
health-related consumer reviews and 25 percent have posted about their health
experience.
Lest
you still think this is just some consumer fad and won't impact hospitals and
other providers, take note that some major players are figuring out new ways to
tap into the social media craze.
At HIMSS last February, Aetna CEO and President, Mark T. Bertolini discussed new apps that the company is developing to let members do Facebook-like searches on doctors. Some health systems are reportedly developing apps that will let patients share physician profiles with their Facebook friends. Others are sure to follow.
At HIMSS last February, Aetna CEO and President, Mark T. Bertolini discussed new apps that the company is developing to let members do Facebook-like searches on doctors. Some health systems are reportedly developing apps that will let patients share physician profiles with their Facebook friends. Others are sure to follow.
But
here's the disconnect for me: "Privacy and security are top consumer
concerns when sharing their health information through social media. Consumers
are most concerned with personal health information being shared in public (63
percent) and information on social media being hacked or leaked (57
percent)," the PwC report notes.
So,
security and privacy are a top concern, yet people are more than willing to
share incredibly personal details about their health status with 700 of their
closest "friends." We all have one or more of those friends.
You know, the ones who post basically post a direct transcript from their most
recent visit to the doctor.
As
Zuckerberg so poetically stated a couple of years ago, privacy is "no
longer a social norm." The challenge, it seems, for the health care
industry, is how to navigate this landscape that seems to change in the blink
of eye.
Matthew Weinstock
H&HN Senior Editor
The
opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the policy of Health
Forum Inc. or the American Hospital Association.
No comments:
Post a Comment